Do You Condone (allow) Animal Testing?

OK

ReDs VS bLuEs

New Debate

ReDs say yes
bLuEs say no

Dual is bLuE

I'm Blue

BLUE.

ugh.

Blue.

No animal should go through that. How'd you feel if they tested on you right.

justinlynch3 wrote:

Blue.

No animal should go through that. How'd you feel if they tested on you right.

*immagines my dog testing on me*


LOLOLOLOL. Definitely a no.

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

dL wrote:

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

Wow, you beat around the bush like a politician. The black market is irrelevant to whether Animal testing is wrong or not. They do whatever the hell they want and even the cops can't touch them because of their power. Now animal testing is wrong simply because it's sheer torture. When we eat animals, we don't torture them. We make it quick and painless (proven). What you're thinking of is when they have growth hormones injected. If they were tortured, they'd be no good to eat.

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

Wow, you beat around the bush like a politician. The black market is irrelevant to whether Animal testing is wrong or not. They do whatever the hell they want and even the cops can't touch them because of their power. Now animal testing is wrong simply because it's sheer torture. When we eat animals, we don't torture them. We make it quick and painless (proven). What you're thinking of is when they have growth hormones injected. If they were tortured, they'd be no good to eat.

um all i can say is that..lol if im going around something tell me what is animal testing? its torture correct?
well i see the black market as a bigger threat to animals than animal testing..yea its wrong..there both wrong but its obvious which is more important dude lol look at sastitics the fact is there r waaay more animals dying in the black market then from animal testing seriously
and dont tell me its away from the subject b/c the blackmarket the way they treat animals its way no different but in larger numbers sense its for profit.
hell i shouldnt even have to explain this to u lol

dL wrote:

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

Wow, you beat around the bush like a politician. The black market is irrelevant to whether Animal testing is wrong or not. They do whatever the hell they want and even the cops can't touch them because of their power. Now animal testing is wrong simply because it's sheer torture. When we eat animals, we don't torture them. We make it quick and painless (proven). What you're thinking of is when they have growth hormones injected. If they were tortured, they'd be no good to eat.

um all i can say is that..lol if im going around something tell me what is animal testing? its torture correct?
well i see the black market as a bigger threat to animals than animal testing..yea its wrong..there both wrong but its obvious which is more important dude lol look at sastitics the fact is there r waaay more animals dying in the black market then from animal testing seriously
and dont tell me its away from the subject b/c the blackmarket the way they treat animals its way no different but in larger numbers sense its for profit.
hell i shouldnt even have to explain this to u lol

That's not the point I was getting at. We can't stop the black market. So to bother debating over them is pointless. We CAN, however, have a voice in scientists testing on them. And either way it's animal torture/testing which you said to be wrong.

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

Wow, you beat around the bush like a politician. The black market is irrelevant to whether Animal testing is wrong or not. They do whatever the hell they want and even the cops can't touch them because of their power. Now animal testing is wrong simply because it's sheer torture. When we eat animals, we don't torture them. We make it quick and painless (proven). What you're thinking of is when they have growth hormones injected. If they were tortured, they'd be no good to eat.

um all i can say is that..lol if im going around something tell me what is animal testing? its torture correct?
well i see the black market as a bigger threat to animals than animal testing..yea its wrong..there both wrong but its obvious which is more important dude lol look at sastitics the fact is there r waaay more animals dying in the black market then from animal testing seriously
and dont tell me its away from the subject b/c the blackmarket the way they treat animals its way no different but in larger numbers sense its for profit.
hell i shouldnt even have to explain this to u lol

That's not the point I was getting at. We can't stop the black market. So to bother debating over them is pointless. We CAN, however, have a voice in scientists testing on them. And either way it's animal torture/testing which you said to be wrong.

yes i did say its wrong hurting animals..torturing living beings is wrong but sometimes thats the only option
if there was another options then hell id support that any day

dL wrote:

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

Ryu wrote:

dL wrote:

justinlynch3 wrote:

dL wrote:

red
hell we eat animals what makes testing on them any different
we got to test if our products r safe somehow

Animals we eat are killed, testing is pretty much just torure and should fall under being cruel to animals, making it against the law.

trust me the animals we kill to eat arent just killed with ease
the animals we consume are treated no different..its proven in many many cases of animal cruelty discovered by the fda...
and hell what about the black market selling endangered species...thats hell of alot more important than a few rats
and no it itsnt against the law b/c if it was it wouldnt be allowed at all
unfortunately we cannot stop the black market and we have no need to..we benefit too much towards it as do other countries...
i mean to me i think the planet should come 1st in every situation...but i dont have the power to do something about it :/
yet anyway...
but the point is...animals being sold in the blackmarket is killing off endangered species...this is truely waay for important
so i say we deal with the bigger issues 1st then look at animal testing shall we

Wow, you beat around the bush like a politician. The black market is irrelevant to whether Animal testing is wrong or not. They do whatever the hell they want and even the cops can't touch them because of their power. Now animal testing is wrong simply because it's sheer torture. When we eat animals, we don't torture them. We make it quick and painless (proven). What you're thinking of is when they have growth hormones injected. If they were tortured, they'd be no good to eat.

um all i can say is that..lol if im going around something tell me what is animal testing? its torture correct?
well i see the black market as a bigger threat to animals than animal testing..yea its wrong..there both wrong but its obvious which is more important dude lol look at sastitics the fact is there r waaay more animals dying in the black market then from animal testing seriously
and dont tell me its away from the subject b/c the blackmarket the way they treat animals its way no different but in larger numbers sense its for profit.
hell i shouldnt even have to explain this to u lol

That's not the point I was getting at. We can't stop the black market. So to bother debating over them is pointless. We CAN, however, have a voice in scientists testing on them. And either way it's animal torture/testing which you said to be wrong.

yes i did say its wrong hurting animals..torturing living beings is wrong but sometimes thats the only option
if there was another options then hell id support that any day

It's never the only option.

well it was interesting hope we get more topics like these in the future but stuff like animal testing isnt exactly what i care about rly but for someone who doesnt care that much i sure put up an agrument i surprised myself XP

dL wrote:

well it was interesting hope we get more topics like these in the future but stuff like animal testing isnt exactly what i care about rly but for someone who doesnt care that much i sure put up an agrument i surprised myself XP

Yeah, not bad dude.

Who won?

Ryu wrote:

Who won?

Not dL

Sain wrote:

Ryu wrote:

Who won?

Not dL

Which means, Ryu and partly Justin wins.

Zero wrote:

Sain wrote:

Ryu wrote:

Who won?

Not dL

Which means, Ryu and partly Justin wins.

Yeah, but DL did well.